![]() The remainder of the introduction outlines the four sections of the book, ending with the statement, “We are all posthuman” (xxi), which summarizes both the lofty scope and the underlying nebulousness of this assemblage of essays. For a scholar new to posthumanism, this synopsis of the field may come across as compelling, if chaotic for a scholar used to the variations of posthumanist terrain, Tarr and White’s approach feels somewhat inapplicable to the essays themselves, as evidenced by multiple subsequent attempts to define post-humanism throughout the collection. Katherine Hayles, Cary Wolfe, and Neil Badmington. They include transhumanism and “popular posthumanism” alongside more commonly drawn-upon sources from critical posthumanism such as Donna Haraway, N. In their introduction, Tarr and White provide an overview of posthumanist theories before previewing the different sections of the collection. Less time is spent discussing the rationale behind adolescence as the overall focus the best essays of the collection spend equal time explicating their usage of posthumanist theory and the relevance of the young adult literature they examine. The essays’ incisive close reading often illuminates adolescent characters’ posthumanist positions in what contributor Maryna Matlock describes as “the spaces between…the tenuous stitches bridging those manufactured divides” (98). Such occasionally confusing repetition is, however, representative of the destabilizing action that is posthumanism’s trademark. Much space is devoted to untangling the definition of posthumanism, both throughout the editors’ introduction and in the introductions of many of the essays, with results that at times contradict one another. ![]() ![]() Tarr, White, and the other contributors whose works make up the collection strive to bring a notoriously complex and heterogeneous theory, or what might be said to be a set of theories collectively termed posthumanism, to bear on the equally complex period known as adolescence. White seek to accomplish in their wide-ranging collection. The Venn diagram of posthumanist theory and children’s and young adult literature criticism thus far has a narrow enough union to justify the broad-scope expansion that editors Anita Tarr and Donna R. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |